![]() ![]() ![]() Army hasn’t found it yet.Tanks - alot are currently swapping cars for tanks If you have a Tank or military vehicle your bored ![]() There must be some sort of acceptable compromise, but after $20 billion spent the U.S. A lighter, more austere vehicle could be easier to deploy overseas but easily destroyed by enemy fire. A heavy vehicle that includes everything, particularly heavy armor, will be hard to ship to a faraway battlefield. Army must also expect to fight on a wide variety of battlefields against a variety of adversaries-but at some point you have to pick and choose. Other candidates for inclusion are drones, an active protection system to shoot down incoming rockets and tank shells, lasers, unmanned control systems, missile and IED jammers, and more. It also needs a fire suppression system, advanced, secure communications, and access to a battlefield computer network. The vehicle needs a medium-caliber gun, at least 30-millimeters but maybe as high as 50 millimeters, and it needs anti-tank missiles to defeat tanks. The General Dynamics Land Systems Griffin III was the last contender standing for the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle. This means the Bradley design will serve for approximately 50 years or more (though most current vehicles are new models). The cancellation of OMFV leaves the Army forced to make do with the Bradley for another 5-10 years, the amount of time it will take to field a replacement in viable numbers. The OMFV program was the third try in 20 years to find a suitable replacement for the M2 Bradley, a tracked vehicle that carries up to seven soldiers into battle. The Army canceled the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program after the number of defense contractors participating in the competition fell to just one. Army’s effort to replace its Cold War-era Bradley infantry fighting vehicles has collapsed, again, leaving the service with no choice but to keep the older vehicles in service. The latest competition fell apart after a disqualification left only one entrant still in the race.The Army has spent $20 billion to develop a replacement, without a single vehicle to show for it.Army's effort to replace the aging M2 Bradley has failed again for the third time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |